Late last year, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) took a bold step towards modernizing medical data exchange by completing a trusted exchange framework and common agreement (TEFCA). The initiative aims to increase equity, innovation and interoperability by encouraging the safe exchange of electronic health records (EHRs). At its heart, TEFCA democratized access to healthcare data, enabling patients, healthcare providers and researchers to benefit from seamless, standardized information sharing.
However, under the new presidential administration, the future of this initiative is uncertain. Skepticism, directing regulatory priorities and skepticism towards broad health care reform, suggests that TEFCA's vision of an open, interoperable health data network may not be fully realized.
Distributed economy
Shutterstock
This raises an immediate question: Can Web3 intervene to fill the gap?
Healthcare Web3 – Offices a fundamentally different approach to healthcare data management, where blockchain, decentralized storage, and tokenized ecosystems are now branded as Desci and often Depin (depending on the infrastructure). It is important to open access to healthcare data. However, Dr. Mitesh Rao, former Chief Patient Safety Officer at Stanford Healthcare and founder and CEO of OMNY Health, does not consider the potential losses to TEFCA as harmful to the industry. In fact, Dr. Rao believes that TEFCA is lacking in many respects, particularly in efficient organizing data for research sharing. This gives Web 3 the opportunity to join the chat.
Unlike traditional intensive health information exchange, Web3 technology emphasizes:
Decentralization: Eliminate a single point of failure and reduce control by major healthcare providers. Patient Sovereignty: Allow individuals to own, control and monetize health data. Security and Transparency: Use blockchain for immutable record management and auditability.
Reality Check: Preparing Web3 Healthcare
Web3 presents a compelling alternative, but several barriers hinder widespread adoption in healthcare.
Regulatory Uncertainty – The US healthcare system complies with strict laws like HIPAA, designed for intensive models. Web3's decentralized pseudonym nature presents legal and compliance challenges. Interoperability Issues – TEFCA promotes standardization, but Web3 solutions remain fragmented. Without a unified framework, it would be difficult to integrate blockchain-based health data with legacy EHR systems. Adoption Hesitance – Hospitals and insurance companies that have become entrenched in traditional systems are slow to trust decentralized technologies. Many are skeptical of the blockchain's ability to handle large volumes of real-time health data transactions. Data Ownership vs. Monetization – Web3 empowers patients to control their data, but ethical monetization raises concerns. Selling personal health data rather than solving existing ones brings new inequality rather than solving existing ones, especially when considering many Desci models and the funding mechanisms they propose.
The vision behind TEFCA (more open, accessible, interoperable healthcare systems are important. However, political and regulatory changes put their success at risk. This provides the opportunity for Web3 to intervene only when addressing key challenges regarding compliance, interoperability and trust.
Web3 may not be fully prepared to take over healthcare yet, but continued innovation, strategic partnerships and evolution of regulations could be key to unlocking a truly patient-centered health data economy.
