• Our Partners
  • CarePolicy
  • HomeCareConsulting
  • Digit9X
  • Home
  • Assisted Living
  • Elderly
  • Home Care Agency
  • Home Care Worker
  • Home Nursing
Menu
  • Home
  • Assisted Living
  • Elderly
  • Home Care Agency
  • Home Care Worker
  • Home Nursing
Home » Colin Campbell: former nurse loses murder conviction appeal
Assisted Living

Colin Campbell: former nurse loses murder conviction appeal

adminBy adminJune 26, 2025No Comments4 Mins Read
Facebook Twitter Pinterest Telegram LinkedIn Tumblr Email Reddit
Share
Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email Copy Link


A former nurse found guilty of murdering four elderly patients has today lost his appeal against the convictions.

Colin Campbell, formerly known as Colin Norris, was convicted in 2008 of murdering four women and attempting to murder a fifth by injecting them with insulin.

All five women were older inpatients on orthopaedic wards in Leeds where Campbell worked as a nurse. Each died after developing severe, unexplained hypoglycaemia.

Campbell was convicted of murdering Doris Ludlam, 80, Bridget Bourke, 88, Irene Crookes, 79, and 86-year-old Ethel Hall at Leeds General Infirmary and St James’s Hospital in 2002, during a five-month trial which concluded in 2008.

He was also found guilty of attempting to murder 90-year-old Vera Wilby.

Campbell was sentenced to life imprisonment with a minimum term of 30 years.

He was also struck off the Nursing and Midwifery Council register in April 2009.

Efforts by Campbell to appeal his convictions were turned down by the Court of Appeal in December 2009. 

In October 2011, Campbell applied to the Criminal Cases Review Commission (CCRC), which investigates potential miscarriages of justice, to review his case.

Some 10 years later, in 2021, the body referred his case back to the Court of Appeal.

It said the case against Campbell was “wholly circumstantial” and “heavily reliant on expert opinion evidence”.

The CCRC considered new expert evidence that concludes that the hypoglycaemia in the four patients other than Ms Hall may be accounted for by natural causes.

The evidence highlighted developments in the understanding of hypoglycaemia, including its prevalence in older and frail people, which cast further doubt on the expert opinion relied upon by the prosecution at trial.

As such, the CCRC said that there was a possibility that the Court of Appeal could find that Campbell’s convictions for the murder or attempted murder of one of more of the four patients was unsafe.

On the murder of Ms Hall, the CCRC considered that the conviction depended upon support from the other four cases, and the prosecution’s assertion that no one other than Campbell could have been responsible.

However, delivering their judgment today, Lady Justice Macur, Mr Justice Picken and Sir Stephen Irwin said: “We have no doubt about the safety of any of the five convictions. The appeals are dismissed.”

During an appeal hearing earlier this year, Michael Mansfield KC, acting for Campbell, noted that the original jury had asked if there were other cases of patients suffering from “sudden and profound” hypoglycaemia in any of the Leeds teaching hospitals after Campbell stopped working.

He alleged that four such cases had since been identified, with the deaths recorded between January 2003 and August 2005.

However, the appeal judges argued that these new cases did not help the appeal.

They said in their judgement: “On our own analysis, the ‘extra’ cases serve to underline rather than undermine this aspect of the phenomena that are said to be distinctive in those cases of administration of exogenous insulin.”

The court of appeal judges began their judgement by warning not to draw parallels between Campbell’s appeal and any other cases.

It comes as former neonatal nurse Lucy Letby – who is serving multiple life sentences for the murder of seven babies and attempting to murder seven others – is having her case considered by the CCRC after two failed appeal attempts.

The judges said: “Some observers have made clear in their applications to follow the proceedings by that they seek to draw parallels between this case and other similar cases that may be ongoing.

“We make clear that we have each contributed to writing this judgment mindful of the necessity to explain the decision we reach, which has been dependent upon our view of an intricate debate between eminent scientists, by identifying the relevant issues and addressing them in terms of an appeal against conviction in the circumstances of this case.”

More on the Colin Campbell case



Source link

Share. Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIn Tumblr Email
admin
  • Website

Related Posts

WRES report shows ‘deeply painful’ racial inequities continue

June 26, 2025

NMC vows to eliminate bias in regulatory processes by 2030

June 26, 2025

Baby formula marketing ‘risking child health’, say campaigners

June 25, 2025
Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

Top Posts

Insurance companies' advance approval pledges are rarely substantive for home health providers.

June 26, 2025

Understand Latin health at Adelantando Healthcare Conference

January 1, 1970

Seton Hall's new university university program explores women's healthcare for future health leaders

January 1, 1970

North Texas medical chain faces possible $300 million fine for 20,000 fake Medicare claims

January 28, 2003
Don't Miss

Colin Campbell: former nurse loses murder conviction appeal

By adminJune 26, 2025

A former nurse found guilty of murdering four elderly patients has today lost his appeal…

WRES report shows ‘deeply painful’ racial inequities continue

June 26, 2025

NMC vows to eliminate bias in regulatory processes by 2030

June 26, 2025

Baby formula marketing ‘risking child health’, say campaigners

June 25, 2025

Subscribe to Updates

Subscribe to our newsletter and never miss our latest news

Subscribe my Newsletter for New Posts & tips Let's stay updated!

About Us
About Us

Welcome to HomeCareNews.us, your trusted source for comprehensive information on home healthcare services. Our mission is to empower individuals and families by providing accurate, up-to-date, and insightful information about essential home care services in USA.

Facebook X (Twitter) Pinterest YouTube WhatsApp
Our Picks

Insurance companies' advance approval pledges are rarely substantive for home health providers.

June 26, 2025

Week 23 June 2025

June 26, 2025

Colin Campbell: former nurse loses murder conviction appeal

June 26, 2025
Most Popular

Insurance companies' advance approval pledges are rarely substantive for home health providers.

June 26, 2025

Understand Latin health at Adelantando Healthcare Conference

January 1, 1970

Seton Hall's new university university program explores women's healthcare for future health leaders

January 1, 1970
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Advertise with Us
  • Contact us
  • DMCA Policy
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms & Conditions
© 2025 HomecareNews.US

Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.